Argument of fact

There is an old kung-fu saying which states, "The hand that strikes also blocks", meaning that when you argue it is to your advantage to anticipate your opposition and strike down their arguments within the body of your own paper. This sentiment is echoed in the popular saying, "The best defense is a good offense". By addressing the opposition you achieve the following goals: You were far more likely to get them to say yes if you anticipated and addressed all of their concerns before they expressed them.

Argument of fact

Islamic philosophy enriches the tradition, developing two types of arguments. Arabic philosophers falasifasuch as Ibn Sina c. The world is composed of temporal phenomena preceded by other temporally-ordered phenomena. Since such a series of temporal phenomena cannot continue to infinity because an actual infinite is impossible, the world must have had a beginning and a cause of its existence, namely, God Craig This version of the argument enters the medieval Christian tradition through Bonaventure —74 in his Sentences II Sent.

Enlightenment thinkers, such as Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz and Samuel Clarke, reaffirmed the cosmological argument. The principle of sufficient reason is likewise employed by Samuel Clarke in his cosmological argument Rowe We could admit an infinite regress of causes if we had evidence for such, but lacking such evidence, God must exist as the non-dependent cause.

For example, since God is immobile and has no body, he cannot properly be said to cause anything. The cosmological argument came under serious assault in the 18th century, first by David Hume and then by Immanuel Kant.

Hume attacks both the view of causation presupposed in the argument that causation is an objective, productive, necessary power relation that holds between two things and the Causal Principle—every contingent being has a cause of its existence—that lies at the heart of the argument.

Kant contends that the cosmological argument, in identifying the necessary being, relies on the ontological argument, which in turn is suspect.

Argument of fact

We will return to these criticisms below. Both theists and nontheists in the last part of the 20th century and the first part of the 21st century generally have shown a healthy skepticism about the argument.

Richard Gale contends, in Kantian fashion, that since the conclusion of all versions of the cosmological argument invokes an impossibility, no cosmological arguments can provide examples of sound reasoning However, Gale seems to have changed his mind and in recent writings proposed and defended his own version of the cosmological argument, which we will consider below.

Similarly, Michael Martin Yet dissenting voices can be heard. There is quite a chance that if there is a God he will make something of the finitude and complexity of a universe. It is very unlikely that a universe would exist uncaused, but rather more likely that God would exist uncaused.

The existence of the universe…can be made comprehensible if we suppose that it is brought about by God. Typology of Cosmological Arguments Philosophers employ diverse classifications of the cosmological arguments.

Swinburne distinguishes inductive from deductive versions. Craig distinguishes three types of deductive cosmological arguments in terms of their approach to an infinite regress of causes. The first, advocated by Aquinas, is based on the impossibility of an essentially ordered infinite regress.

Craig notes that the distinction between these types of arguments is important because the objections raised against one version may be irrelevant to other versions.Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth [Bart D.

Ehrman] on alphabetnyc.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In Did Jesus Exist?

Arguments of Fact by on Prezi

historian and Bible expert Bart Ehrman confronts the question, "Did Jesus exist at all?" Ehrman vigorously defends the historical Jesus. This paper first summarizes the central theory of psychoanalysis, beginning with Freud's groundbreaking contributions divided into five parts: dynamic, economic, developmental, structural, and adaptive.

It then moves on to more recent developments within the . Additionally, they also need to be careful when making claims of fact that they are not constructing a circular argument. For example, a claim is true because Source A says it is. I know Source A is right because it is never wrong.

The cosmological argument is less a particular argument than an argument type. It uses a general pattern of argumentation (logos) that makes an inference from particular alleged facts about the universe (cosmos) to the existence of a unique being, generally identified with or referred to as alphabetnyc.com these initial facts are that particular beings or events in the universe are causally.

Argument of fact

Arguments of Fact, On page , read the suggestions and examples under "Finding a Topic" beneath the "Guide to Writing an Argument of Fact".

In groups, discuss possible topics, hypotheses, or theses suitable for an argument of fact. Which topics work, and why?

The Court holds oral argument in about cases each year.

Notes for Essay 1 Arguments of Fact Purpose: Various publics, national or local, need well- reasoned factual arguments on subjects to make well-informed decisions. Such arguments educate audiences. Ad Hominem (Argument To The Man): attacking the person instead of attacking his argument. For example, "Von Daniken's books about ancient astronauts . To write an argument essay, you’ll need to gather evidence and present a well-reasoned argument on a debatable issue. How can I tell if my topic is debatable? Check your thesis! You cannot argue a statement of fact, you must base your paper on a strong position. Ask yourself.

The arguments are an opportunity for the Justices to ask questions directly of the attorneys representing the parties to the case, and for the attorneys to highlight arguments that they view as particularly important.

Oral Arguments - Supreme Court of the United States