Archive Words Andrew Benjamin This is an article from the Architecture Australia archives and may use outdated formatting.
A brief essay about the thin line dividing architecture and sculpture, and how those concepts are being confused by G. The first of them is a work by an architect.
The second one, a work by a sculptor.
However, does it mean that the first one is unquestionably an architecture work? Or would be more correct to consider that we are looking at a large sculpture "disguised" as architecture? Personally, I would incline to accept this second option, basing this idea on a series of reasons that I'll develop in this essay.
In his essential book "Introduzione all'architettura", Bruno Zevi, one of the most important Architecture critics of the 20th century, points, talking about to the Parthenon: But those who approach to the Parthenon and contemplate it as a great sculpture will stay admired as in front of the best works ever created by the human genius".
Saving the obvious temporary distances, this affirmation would be suitable for most of the most celebrated architectures of nowadays. What is Architecture, after all? Is it possible to find an exact definition that allows us to trace a dividing line between what we can consider Architecture and what no?
It is very probable that no, as no precise definition exist for the concept of Art, or even for the concept of Love. But it is possible, for example, to distinguish between what is Architecture and what is just construction.
Nobody doubts, for example, that a gothic chapel or a Venetian palace is an excellent and unquestionable example of Architecture, whereas a great petrol tank of similar dimensions does not deserve such consideration.
In the same way, it is also possible to find values that allow us to distinguish between what is Architecture, and what is - voluntarily or not- a sculpture of huge dimensions.
Almost all the Architecture critics of the last two centuries agree on the idea of pointing the interior space as the defining factor in Architecture. In his consideration of the Parthenon as a not-architecture, Zevi points out that the Greek temple was conceived to be admired from the outside, as a glorious and impenetrable object, admirable by its harmony, proportions and rich decoration.
This appreciation is applicable to many works of nowadays, whose exterior brightness turns them into modern formal temples; whose interior space - which of course exists, and can be even well designed- is pushed into the background.
This interior space must be, of course, dedicated to a sole protagonist: Thus, that a work supposes a remarkable spatial experience for the user or visitor is not sufficient to consider it as Architecture: But this is, in any case, a sculptural, not architectonic space.
But the prominence of the interior space is not the sole characteristic of the Architecture.Essay on A Marble Sculpture Of A Soldier Helping A Fallen Comrade The Arch of Titus is another Roman piece of architecture that we still marvel to this day.
The large freestanding arch standing 50 feet served as a base for an even bigger statue of a 4 horse chariot .
Compilation of Philippine Sculpture and Architecture Essay The artist alternately switches from sculptor to painting, revealing the same eloquent and dynamic effect.
He says “the medium may be different but both are basically visual”. Compilation of Philippine Sculpture and Architecture Essay Sculpture of: “Transfiguration” Napoleón Isabelo Veloso Abueva (born January 26, ), more popularly known as Napoleón Abueva, is a . Essay: architecture and culture Archive Words Andrew Benjamin.
This is an article from the Architecture Australia archives and may use outdated alphabetnyc.com us if you would like us to consider upgrading it to the current format.
- Egyptian Art and Architecture Egyptian Art and Architecture, the buildings, paintings, sculpture, and allied arts of ancient Egypt, from prehistoric times to its conquest by the Romans in 30 bc.
Egypt had the longest unified history of any civilization in the ancient Mediterranean, extending with few interruptions from about bc to the. It is a useful art and, like painting and sculpture, it can also be a fine art that touches all of our lives. Without architecture, there would be no buildings or art of any kind.
It is the architects that designs and creates from imagination the structures that can be seen today. Essays Related to Architecture. /5(9).